Top Reasons Kamala Harris Lost Key Endorsement

   Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has encountered significant challenges in securing endorsements from traditionally Democratic-aligned organizations and media outlets this election cycle. Recent reports indicate that she has notably lost the endorsement of the Los Angeles Times, a publication that has historically supported her in previous campaigns. In 2016, the LA Times endorsed her candidacy for the U.S. Senate over Barbara Boxer, and in 2020, it backed the Biden-Harris ticket. However, this year, the newspaper has opted not to endorse any candidate in the presidential race.

In its recent electoral endorsements for the 2024 election, the LA Times emphasized the critical nature of this election, stating that it may be "the most consequential election in a generation." Despite this assertion, the editorial board's commentary on the presidential race was minimal, indicating a shift in their approach to endorsements. Historically, the board has consistently supported Democratic candidates, beginning with its endorsement of then-Senator Barack Obama in 2008. However, internal discussions revealed that the editorial board would not be endorsing any candidate for the upcoming presidential election, a decision attributed to the paper's owner, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, who has a background in the healthcare industry.

The rationale behind the LA Times' decision remains unclear, as the publication did not provide specific reasons for its choice. It did, however, mention on its online endorsement page that the editorial board selectively endorses candidates, focusing on the most significant races. A spokesperson for the LA Times declined to comment on the internal deliberations regarding endorsements, reinforcing the notion that the decision-making process is private and not subject to public scrutiny. This development marks a notable departure from the paper's previous patterns of support for Democratic candidates, raising questions about the implications for Harris's campaign and the broader electoral landscape.

   There appears to be a significant situation unfolding, likely linked to Harris' efforts to balance the interests of both Israel and Gaza. Nika Soon-Shiong, daughter of Soon-Shiong, has been frequently mentioned in discussions due to her radical affiliations with the Democrat Socialists of America and other fringe groups, openly expressing her views. Over the past four years, allegations have surfaced suggesting that she has influenced endorsements for her favored candidates while suppressing others. However, representatives from the LA Times stated in 2022 that Nika Soon-Shiong had no role in the endorsement process. Consequently, Kamala Harris has not sufficiently satisfied the pro-Hamas faction within the Democratic Party, leading to Nika Soon-Shiong's discontent.

The financial struggles of the Times, which is reportedly losing over $30 million annually, may also be a factor in this scenario. The paper's strong endorsement of George Gascón, who is currently trailing in the polls by a significant margin of 30 points, raises questions about its relevance and connection to the public. This situation may prompt Dr. Soon-Shiong to recognize the disconnect between the paper's editorial stance and the sentiments of its readership.

In light of these developments, it is plausible that Dr. Soon-Shiong is seeking to address the challenges facing his publication. By reassessing the editorial direction and attempting to align it more closely with public opinion, he may be aiming to mitigate the financial losses and restore credibility to the Times. The interplay between political endorsements and financial viability could be crucial in determining the future trajectory of the publication.

Thank you for your donation!