"It's obvious that ABC has an agenda against Trump. The way they are framing their questions is completely one-sided"
In the recent three-on-one debate, the moderators from ABC News employed questionable crime statistics from the FBI to challenge the assertions made by @realDonaldTrump. Contrary to their claims, Trump was accurate in stating that crime rates are not decreasing; in fact, they are significantly increasing. This misrepresentation of data raises concerns about the integrity of the information being disseminated to the public, particularly when it comes to understanding the true state of crime in America.
The narrative propagated by Kamala Harris and certain segments of the mainstream media suggests that violent crime in the United States has reached a 50-year low, a claim that has been uncritically echoed by fact-checking organizations such as Politifact and ABC News. However, the reality is that the reliability of violent crime statistics has deteriorated. Following the Biden-Harris administration's decision to overhaul the FBI's crime reporting system in 2021, many law enforcement agencies have opted out of participating in the new framework. This has resulted in a significant gap in data collection, with approximately 25% of crime statistics going unreported, thereby distorting the overall picture of public safety and masking the genuine concerns of citizens facing escalating crime rates.
In cities governed by Democratic leadership, such as New York and San Francisco, there has been a notable trend towards the decriminalization of violent offenses. For example, in New York City, a staggering 52% of violent felony cases are being reclassified as misdemeanors, often accompanied by diversion programs that effectively remove these incidents from official crime statistics. This manipulation of data could easily account for a substantial reduction in reported violent crime rates in the city. Furthermore, prosecutors backed by influential figures like George Soros are increasingly reluctant to pursue charges against violent offenders or are opting to lessen the severity of those charges. Such practices contribute to a misleading narrative regarding public safety, while communities grapple with the real and pressing issue of rising crime.
It is not unreasonable to speculate that the Biden-Harris administration, along with the Democratic Party, has replaced the FBI's comprehensive crime data reporting system with a new optional framework designed to create the illusion of a significant decline in reported crime rates. This alteration raises critical concerns regarding the underlying intentions of the administration and the reliability of the data being presented to the public. The implications of such a change could undermine trust in law enforcement statistics and the broader narrative surrounding crime in the United States.
Proponents of the new reporting system, particularly within the Democratic Party, may contend that it enhances inclusivity by enabling law enforcement agencies to document various identities, including pronouns, gender identities, and sexual orientations of both offenders and victims. However, the optional nature of this system, coupled with its introduction at a time of rising crime rates, suggests a potential agenda aimed at obscuring the true increase in criminal activity. This raises the possibility that the administration seeks to construct a misleading narrative of progress and safety under its governance, thereby manipulating public perception.
Furthermore, the influence of approximately 70 prosecutors backed by George Soros, who collectively represent a significant portion of the American population and many of the largest urban areas, has contributed to the implementation of restorative justice policies. These policies often prioritize social factors over public safety, leading to a reluctance to prosecute violent offenders based on their race or gender identity. Consequently, many violent crimes are downgraded to lesser charges, resulting in a distorted view of crime statistics. Together, the introduction of the optional reporting system and the adoption of restorative justice practices have created a misleading portrayal of crime trends since 2021, fostering a false sense of security among the public and allowing the Democratic leadership to promote an inaccurate narrative regarding safety and crime reduction.
Recent national surveys indicate that a significant majority of Americans perceive a notable increase in crime over the last four years. This perception is particularly acute in major cities governed by Democratic leadership, where nearly all residents report experiencing a dramatic rise in criminal activity. Alarmingly, many individuals claim that they or a family member have fallen victim to crime, underscoring the pervasive nature of this issue within urban environments.
Taking Chicago as a case study, the city faces a staggering crisis, with approximately 70 individuals shot every weekend. The severity of the situation has prompted the mayor to terminate the city's contract with a company responsible for detecting and reporting gunfire, highlighting the overwhelming frequency of such incidents. The sheer volume of gunfire has reached a point where law enforcement can only respond to shootings when there is a confirmed injury, reflecting a troubling reality for residents who live in constant fear of violence.
Similarly, New York City is grappling with a significant rise in robberies and assaults, many of which occur in broad daylight, further exacerbating public safety concerns. The escalation of these crimes has led the governor to deploy National Guard troops to the subway system in an effort to deter criminal activity. Under the leadership of District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Attorney General Letitia James, many violent offenses that would have previously been prosecuted as felonies are now frequently reduced to misdemeanors, often accompanied by diversion agreements, raising questions about the effectiveness of the current legal approach to combating crime.
There exists substantial evidence suggesting that the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in conjunction with the Biden-Harris administration, is engaging in questionable practices regarding the accuracy of crime statistics. Jesse Waters has brought attention to what he characterizes as Enron-style corruption within their crime reporting methodologies, highlighting the potential manipulation of data to present a more favorable narrative. This raises significant concerns about the integrity of the information being disseminated to the public and the implications it has for understanding the true nature of crime in the country.
When confronted with assertions that the Biden and Harris administration has successfully lowered crime rates to their lowest levels in half a century, it is crucial to challenge such claims with factual evidence. The assertion becomes particularly dubious when one considers that critical data from approximately 25% of the population residing in major urban centers, such as Los Angeles and New York City, is often excluded from these reports. This selective omission skews the overall crime statistics and creates a distorted perception of safety and security in the nation.
The implications of these omissions are profound, as they contribute to a misleading narrative regarding the actual state of crime in America. It is essential for citizens to remain vigilant and not be swayed by manipulated figures that serve to obscure the truth. Advocating for complete transparency and accountability in crime reporting is imperative to ensure that the public receives an accurate representation of crime trends, thereby enabling informed discussions and policy decisions based on reality rather than fabricated statistics.
Add comment
Comments